Wednesday, May 14, 2014

But There's A Very Important Difference Between Bill Keller And Jill Abramson

I wonder what it could be.
Several weeks ago, I’m told, Abramson discovered that her pay and her pension benefits as both executive editor and, before that, as managing editor, were considerably less than the pay and pension benefits of Bill Keller, the male editor whom she replaced in both jobs. “She confronted the top brass,” one close associate said, and this may have fed into the management’s narrative that she was “pushy,” a characterization that, for many, has an inescapably gendered aspect. Sulzberger is known to be believe that the Times, as a financially beleaguered newspaper, has had to retreat on some of its generous pay and pension benefits[.]

I bet Keller was paid absurd amounts, and was continued to be paid absurd amounts for his horrible column. Still, we must "retreat on some" of that "generous pay."