When the New York Times embarks on one of its agenda-driven missions - anti-Mamdani, anti-Trans, anti-Claudine Gay, for example - there are a couple of obvious takeaways. One is that they are very dishonest as they deny that they are doing the thing they are obviously doing. Two is that they communicate the things that they (the institutional 'they') think are important, and by implication the things that don't bother them much at all.
